Articles Posted in Cruise Ship Accidents/Incidents

Once again, Carnival cruise line braces itself for some hard questioning and strong reaction from the public, after one of its vessels, the Carnival Triumph, wound up stranded in the Gulf of Mexico . This is the result of yet, another engine room fire, which left cruise ship passengers without very basic needs including: food, water, toilets, and power. Needless to say, passengers are disgruntled and Carnival is under fire by news agencies, and thousands of individuals concerned about the safety of cruising.

Carnival has not yet answered the looming question as to what caused a fire on the 14 year old ship which was based in Galveston, Texas. While the Costa Concordia ship wreck last year, is reminiscent of this incident, fortunately there were no casualties or incidents on the Carnival Triumph, like there were on the Concordia. So, why do there continue to be fires on ships, leaving passengers stranded in the ocean, sometimes ship wrecked for days?
One of the more recent forms of injury on board cruises results from extremely high numbers of sexual assaults that occur on cruise ships. Most often, these forms of crimes are committed against passengers by crew members. Cruise ship guidelines are not clear cut regarding background checks on employees, especially those who are hired overseas. Although, Carnival and many of the other major cruise lines are based in cities like Miami, Fl and Ft. Lauderdale, Fl the crew itself are from foreign countries and screening these people is difficult and not without major loop holes.

Continue reading

Passengers Badly Rattled As Cruise Ships Ventured Through Superstorm Sandy

As Americans continue to tune into coverage of the massive land damage caused by Hurricane Sandy, it may be inconceivable to many that cruise ship operators did not uniformly cancel Florida-based cruises that were set to sail into or near the well-mapped hurricane. Yet, while some cruise operators made the sound decision not to expose cruise passengers to the risks of Sandy, others directed their ships to proceed full steam ahead, with only minor course adjustments, arguing that modern cruise ships’ elaborate stabilization systems would protect them from the ravages of severely rough seas and exposing them to any accident or injuries. Unfortunately, top-heavy floating resorts proved no match for Sandy, and passengers trapped on these during the hurricane ended up witnessing frightening chaos and destruction.

The Show Must Go On, Say Cruise Operators

The October 29, 2012 edition of the Salisbury Post recounted the experience of a North Carolina family whose cruise on Disney’s Fantasy put them into the path of the storm. That account credits the ship’s captain with charting a course that avoided the fiercest zone of the hurricane, and with warning passengers to stay in their cabins; but it also conveys the great anxiety suffered by the family when it realized that “anything not bolted to the walls or floors was sliding side to side,” and that “deck chairs had crashed through doors.” Ultimately, said the mother of this family, one had to resort to faith in God in order to survive the terrifying ordeal.

At the time superstorm Sandy was brewing, the Bradley family of Cascade, Iowa, was scheduled to sail from Port Canaveral to the Caribbean on Disney’s Dream. According to coverage by KWWL TV in Iowa, the Bradleys tried to cancel their cruise reservations when they learned of the impending storm, but they were told by Disney that they would not receive a refund if they cancelled, and that they should rest assured that the cruise would safely avoid the path of the storm. Thus pressured to sail, the Bradleys traveled to Florida and boarded ship, but only hours after setting sail, the ship began to experience direct effects of the hurricane. According to the news report, the Bradleys watched unanchored objects rain down from shelves, and felt their cabins rattling. The severe rocking of the ship caused the Bradleys’ grandson to fall out of bed. Mrs. Bradley told KWWL that Disney “should have canceled instead of putting our lives in danger out there in 20 foot swells.”

Continue reading

Carnival Corporation was dealt a heavy legal blow a few weeks ago when an appeals court reinstated a federal Florida case brought against it by the family of 15-year-old Liz Marie Perez Chaparro, a Carnival cruise ship passenger who was shot and killed during a shore excursion in the port of St. Thomas. See our related June 2, 2011 blog “Family of Carnival Cruise Ship Passenger Killed In St. Thomas Shootout Sues Cruise Line.” Carnival’s attorneys had argued that the Chaparros’ negligence suit called for standards of care higher than those that should apply to cruise ship operators, but the appeals court didn’t buy this and opened the case back up for trial. According to reporting in the September 5, 2012 edition of The Christian Science Monitor, this development has major significance “because it could further define to what extent cruise ship companies – part of a $29 billion industry – may be held liable for criminal acts perpetrated on passengers exploring various ports of call.”

When Onshore Crimes Against Passengers Are Foreseeable
As recounted in the appeals court record, Liz Marie and her family were vacationing aboard the Carnival cruise ship Victory on July 12, 2010, when they decided to disembark and visit Coki Beach, a tourist site on St. Thomas. When the family headed out to the Beach in an open-air bus, they were unaware that Coki Beach was plagued by gang-related crime, and that the funeral of a St. Thomas gang member was to take place, that day, in the vicinity. The bus got trapped in traffic as it passed the funeral site on its way from the Beach back to the Victory, and it was unable to break free when a gang-related gunfight broke out. Liz Marie was shot as bullets sprayed the trapped tourist bus, and she died before the bus could make it to a local hospital. Her family watched in horror as all of this transpired.

Though the Chaparros’ Coki Beach excursion was not officially sponsored by Carnival, Carnival was apparently quite familiar with Coki Beach, because it regularly sold excursion tickets to this destination. Attorneys for the family moreover asserted that because Carnival routinely monitors crime in its ports of call, Carnival had every reason to know the risks, at Coki Beach, for drug activity, theft, and gang violence. The Chaparros therefore argued in their initial filing that Carnival’s failure to warn them of the dangers in St. Thomas, and on Coki Beach, in particular, constituted negligence, as these dangers were entirely foreseeable to Carnival.

The Duty to Warn Against Foreseeable Onshore Crimes
Carnival initially succeeded in getting the Chaparros’ lawsuit dismissed, but the Chaparros persisted and appealed. When the federal appeals court reinstated their case, it stated that at trial, Carnival’s failure to warn the Chaparros of the dangers at Coki Beach would be scrutinized under the Florida-based legal principle that “a cruise line owes its passengers a duty to warn of known dangers beyond the point of debarkation in places where passengers are invited or reasonably expected to visit.” The appeals court added that this duty to warn is entirely consistent with federal maritime law, which requires shipowners to protect passengers against any risky conditions of which the ship owners are actually aware, or of which they should be aware.

Nothing can bring Liz Marie back to life, but as the Chaparros get their day in court, they shall be seeking damages for negligence and negligent infliction of emotional distress. The emotional distress claim is brought on grounds that the Chaparros have suffered physical manifestations of the emotional trauma they experienced as they witnessed Liz Marie’s death (and as they sat fearing for their own lives) and that these injuries are the direct result of Carnival’s failure to warn them away from a well-known zone of danger.

Unfortunately, cruise ship passengers are likely to continue facing perils from criminal acts committed both on board and on shore, and they shall continue to need the effective legal representation that gives victims in such cases a chance at just compensation. Success in cruise ship accident cases depends on the up-to-date knowledge and mastery of specialized maritime litigation procedures that only highly experienced maritime attorneys can offer. Gerson & Schwartz has recovered millions of dollars in a wide variety of maritime personal injury cases, and we are dedicated to helping you should you need assistance in this area. For information on how we can help, call (305) 371-6000 or e-mail us at info@gslawusa.com.

Continue reading

Several weeks after the disappearance of her daughter from Bahamas-bound cruise ship Allure of the Seas, a grief-stricken mother retained Florida legal counsel to gather facts and ask tough questions of Royal Caribbean International, the ship’s owner. Shortly after the ship left Port Everglades on September 16, Vera Marion’s daughter Ariel fell overboard under as-yet undetermined circumstances. A U.S. Coast Guard effort to find her was discontinued on September 18th. According to an October 3 report in the Sun-Sentinel, when Ariel joined her mother on the cruise from which she would never return, Ariel was happily anticipating the start of a new modeling job that she had just landed.

Vera Marion has since shared with NBC South Florida her conviction that had cruise ship personnel acted promptly on the initial report of Ariel’s fall, Ariel could have been rescued. According to reports, Royal Caribbean International has, in fact, admitted that after ship officials received an urgent call from a passenger who witnessed the fall, instead of undertaking rescue efforts, ship’s security proceeded to take over an hour to review surveillance video for evidence of what had already been reported reliably. Making matters worse, according to the U.S. Coast Guard, it was not notified of the incident until over two hours after Ariel was seen tumbling into the ocean, and for all this time, the Allure of the Seas was sailing full-steam ahead, away from the location of Ariel’s disappearance. Eventually, the Allure of the Seas was stopped and turned around, and the Coast Guard and three nearby ships undertook a search, but these belated gestures were to no avail.

Continue reading

Passengers of the ill-fated Costa Concordia, along with Italian businesses damaged by the cruise ship’s grounding on January 13, 2012, have begun to file lawsuits in American courts against Miami-based Carnival Corporation, the parent company of the Italian firm (Costa Crociere) that owns the Costa Concordia. Attorneys representing the injured parties assert that Costa Crociere is merely Carnival’s ‘alter ego,’ making Carnival liable for the injuries, deaths, and property losses that occurred. According to an Associated Press report of September 17th, the suing parties hail from 14 countries, including the U.S. Monetary damages sought in the new U.S.-based lawsuits reach into the tens of millions of dollars.

Continue reading

Late last week, on its approach to the Faroe Islands port of Klaksvik, Royal Caribbean cruise ship Jewel of the Seas struck an aerial cable that links the Islands of Bordoy and Eysturoy. The ship’s mast was damaged, and a crew member was heavily battered by falling debris. The cause of the Jewel of the Seas accident has yet to be determined, but an investigation, now pending in consultation with local authorities, will inevitably attempt to identify any faulty decisions or operating procedures that led not only to the cable collision, but also to the dislodging of items that ultimately struck the vulnerable crew member. Maritime accident law will then govern any damage claims that are pursued.

Anticipating questions about possible navigation error, Florida-based Royal Caribbean International issued a statement, reported in the September 6, 2012 edition of USA Today, insisting that all available navigation information, including information received from the Klaksvik harbor master, had pointed to the ship’s clear passage under the cable. This assertion, however, is not likely to put navigational concerns to rest, coming only months after the fatal grounding of the cruise ship Costa Concordia, which, it is now known, was triggered by disastrously bad navigation decisions.

Continue reading

The ongoing saga regarding the unexplained disappearance of passenger George Smith, who went missing on board the Royal Caribbean’s Brilliance Cruise ship in July 5, 2005, continues to draw media interest. This time by Inside Edition. As many may recall from previous stories such as the one which aired on Dateline NBC in January 2012, George Smith was on his honeymoon when he disappeared; and many, including his family members, believe that he was murdered.

The most recent theory surrounding Smith’s death is that he died at the hands of robbers while on board the cruise. According to the New York Post, this was a “robbery-gone bad”. In a civil lawsuit, settlement was reached initially for $1,060,000 in compensation, and was increased several years later by $250,000 for a total of $1,310,000. It is highly unusual for additional payments to be made after an initial settlement. What made Royal Caribbean agree to pay more? This strange development has never been explained.

This time, a video has surfaced, documenting a conversation between two passengers from this cruise. In the videos, the men are clearly amused; as, they discuss having thrown a man overboard. They are seen joking and laughing about it on tape.

Subsequently , both men’s depositions were taken during the litigation and according to Inside Edition, both men pleaded the fifth amendment when asked questions regarding George Smith’s possible murder. Smith’s family continues to believe that their son, 26 years old at the time, was murdered in connection with a robbery on board the ship, and quite possibly by one or both of these individuals.

Unfortunately, cruise ship crimes are quite common and problems of crimes and disappearances have been kept under wraps for years by the cruising industry. Maritime lawyers at Gerson & Schwartz, PA strive to protect clients from the industry wrongdoing by providing professional assistance in recovering damages for claims against the cruise ship companies. Wrongful death claims and other crimes against passengers such as rapes, medical mal practice, or gross negligence which frequently occur on cruise ships, require experienced attorneys to navigate a path towards restitution for those involved. Lack of security on board cruises is an ongoing problem and justice can be served by way of legal action.

Continue reading

The cruise ship industry continues to be scrutinized, as engine fires and other mishaps occur regularly on board these massive floating cities. Passengers are feeling less and less safe, while profits continue to drop. Clearly, the industry is suffering financially. This month alone, Royal Caribbean reported that its First- quarter profits dropped by 40 percent from $78.4 million to $47 million in 2012. http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/04/21/2760535/engine-room-fire-reported-aboard.html#storylin

In a series of ship fires and other disasters, the latest incident took place on the Royal Caribbean’s Allure of the Seas last weekend. This time a fire broke out in the engine room, causing the world’s largest cruise ship to activate its fog system. The fire was immediately extinguished and contained, fortunately.

Why does it seem like news of cruise ship mayhem is on the radar more often than not? Why isn’t more being done to avoid catastrophes, such as the Costa Concordia’s running aground off the coast of Italy last January? That incident alone killed 32 innocent people.

Or what about the subsequent fire, on board Royal Caribbean’s Azamara ship? That completely disabled the ship without any power whatsoever, for five entire days while stranded off the coast of Borneo.

What is going on with the overall lack of safety on cruises these days? In addition to fires and pilot errors, passengers on board cruises are suffering tremendously from viral outbreaks such as Norovirus, as a result of unsanitary conditions on ships. In addition, passenger claims are constantly in the news for sexual assaults and violence. Crew members who are constantly held responsible for these inappropriate and illegal behaviors are supposed to be protecting passengers safety, not violating it.

In another negligent twist, just last month a captain of a Princess Cruise ship sailed right past a fishing boat that was clearly in distress. How could the captain of this vessel say he never noticed this stranded boat, while numerous passengers on board his ship said they alerted the authorities immediately? These kinds of inconsistencies are all too inexcusable.

Continue reading

Why does it keep happening? Bookings have dropped after successive cruise accidents continue to occur. This time, it is Royal Caribbean and its’ Azamara Quest which was carrying 590 passengers and 411 crew members when one of the ship’s engine room’s caught fire.
Despite the fact, that this incident was a lot less harrowing than the other recent maritime accidents, passengers were still frightened to death; and, 5 crew members suffered smoke inhalation injuries, including one which was serious and needed hospital care. The Miami Herald 03/31/12. This is yet another terrifying example of a cruise ship that lost power due to an electrical fire. Of course, it does not compare to the devastation of the Costa Concordia this past January, when that ship hit a reef off the coast of Italy. Actually, the Azamara fire is the third fire on a cruise ship, since November 2010. This time the emergency occurred off the coast of Borneo, during a voyage to Malaysia.

The Royal Caribbean owned ship, the Azamara Quest sustained an electrical fire which was quickly extinguished by crew members. An emergency cancellation for the trip was put into effect, and the ship was forced to end its voyage early in Sandakan, Malaysia. It never made it through Indonesia as scheduled where the trip was supposed to end in Singapore on April 12.

“This Royal Caribbean cruise ship fire reminds us of a previous fire a few weeks ago, on board the Silver Shadow cruise ship”, said Attorney Nicholas Gerson of Gerson & Schwartz, PA. Similarly, this electrical fire affected the air conditioning system, on the Azamara Quest. As a result, many of the 11-deck vessel’s entertainment facilities, which include a spa and shopping boutiques which were all shut down. Passengers such as Dorothy Wood of Virginia Beach, Virginia were petrified” (AP).

“And we will never forget the images of the Costa Concordia hitting a reef off the coast of Italy”, added Gerson, an experienced maritime attorney at Gerson & Schwartz, PA, based in Miami , Florida. “The cruise ship industry is not ensuring the safety of its passengers. We will continue to seek restitution for our clients who suffer injuries as a result of their negligence.” So why does this industry continue touting about how safe it is? For instance, training groups such as Resolve Maritime Group, whose owner, Joe Farrell states, that cruise ships are the “safest industry, safest mode of travel there is.” However, the evidence does not support this claim, and experienced maritime attorneys at Gerson & Schwartz, beg to differ.

We are seeing a high rate of incidents on cruise ships lately demonstrating that there is not an acceptable level of risk for travelers . As of Monday, Royal Caribbean stock closed at least one percent lower from the previous close.
Maritime attorneys like Philip and Nicholas Gerson at Gerson & Schwartz, PA, are well aware of the dangers involved on board cruises, and are committed to recovering compensatory and punitive damages for their clients who are survivors or injured parties. “With so many frightening occurrences on cruise ships lately, we believe that the industry should be doing more to protect its passengers. We will continue to serve our clients who become injured on board ships due to lack of standards, care, or accountability. The industry should be doing more to make sure that their ships are safe, especially in light of the all these recent incidents.”

Continue reading

Miami FL February 9, 2012 – Half submerged off the western coast of Italy, the Costa Concordia cruise ship is an all-too-vivid reminder that the international cruise industry is in dire need of safety reforms, says veteran Miami injury lawyer Philip M. Gerson. Indeed, the industry, says the long-time advocate for cruise ship injury victims, has operated for decades in a regulatory vacuum that has left crew certifications and training lacking — and put passengers at risk.

“One hundred years after the Titanic nothing has changed,” says Gerson, the senior partner at Miami’s Gerson & Schwartz. “The way the industry operates, it is a disaster waiting to happen, and on the night of January 13 that, unfortunately, is exactly what we got. After the ship grounded and lives were lost and saved, there was a great focus on the actions, or inactions, of the captain. But as the investigation continues, what we’re seeing now is the crux of the problem in the cruise industry today: inadequately trained crews and a regulatory black hole. It’s something that should have been fixed decades ago.”

On the surface, the cruise industry is all glamour and luxury, floating hotel palaces on the seas. But behind the scenes, says Gerson, a longtime advisor to the International Cruise Victims Association, the picture is far less rosy. “Crew members are generally not long-term employees of a specific cruise line, but independent contractors who sign aboard for a few months at a time, and often move from vessel to vessel, cruise line to cruise line,” says Gerson. “Crews are poorly paid and inadequately trained. And what compounds the problem is that there is scant regulation and enforcement. A crew member who is ill-prepared for an emergency on his first cruise will likely be ill-prepared on his fiftieth cruise. He’ll move from ship to ship and operators have little incentive to foot the cost of his training — and often, little legal obligation.”

As the Costa Concordia investigation unfolds, it is becoming clear, says Gerson, that a poorly trained crew was a primary factor contributing to the tragedy. “What we are hearing, both from official channels and from Costa Concordia passengers who have contacted our firm, is that many crew members just didn’t know what to do. They were telling passengers to return to their cabins, that it was just an electrical fault, when it was, of course, an urgent emergency. There were heroic crew members, to be sure, but by and large, the people who survived did so because of their own good judgment.”

As details of the disaster and its aftermath emerge, the public will get a full picture of training and safety deficiencies that not only plagued the crew of the Costa Concordia, but the entire cruise ship industry, says Gerson. “We have to make the changes that should have been made years ago,” says the veteran Miami injury lawyer. “First, we have to have uniform, mandatory, and strictly enforced certifications of competence and ongoing training for all cruise ship crew members. And it has to be done on an international level, not the loose, lax, piecemeal regulatory structures that exist — in some places, for some crew — today.”

The next step, says Gerson, is to eliminate the current liability caps that limit the financial responsibility of ship operators. “These caps are not only unfair and unrealistic, but dangerous. If a ship’s operator has little fear of liability, they have little incentive to strengthen their safety training requirements, because doing so costs money. As the catastrophe off the coast of Italy makes clear, without the prospect of substantial liability, safety and training will be compromised. It’s time to change that — and changing the laws will be a big step in the right direction.”

Continue reading

Contact Information